Last week, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) held its 95th meeting in Buenos Aires, Argentina. It was an important moment in the history of the IETF as it was the first time in its history that it held a meeting in Latin America.
On Monday, 4 April the HRPC group held its session. During this well-attended two hour session, there were presentations from three experts, working on issues surrounding protocols and human rights:
Ramsey Nasser, a Lebanese computer scientist, game designer, and educator based in Brooklyn who does research on programming languages talked about قلب (‘kalbe’) an all Arabic coding language he build to make computation more expressive and challenge the basic assumptions we make about code.
Nick Doty, the Director of the Center for Technology, Society & Policy and PhD Candidate at the UC Berkeley School of Information, spoke about his research on how privacy and other values are considered during the technical design process.
Joe Hall, Chief Technologist at the Centre for Democracy and Technology spoke about his work on censorship, specifically his work on the technical mechanisms used by censorship regimes around the world to block or impair Internet traffic and the importance of sensitizing designers, implementers, and users of Internet protocols to the mechanisms used to censor end-user access to information.
During the meeting, the research group’s members also presented their latest work, including two new Internet Drafts (I-Ds), improvements to the I-Ds’ text on the research methodology, the addition of three new case studies, an additional literature and discussion session.
The first outline of the human rights protocol considerations was also presented at this session, which aim to clarify how technical concepts relate to human rights, and what questions engineers should ask themselves when developing or improving protocols. The aim of these proposed considerations is that engineers will comprehensively analyze the potential implications of their work for human rights, and will clearly document their decisions.
The proposed human rights considerations were positively received, and the group received substantial feedback on their work. Currently, the aim is a formal call for adoption of the I-Ds, to be distributed on the HRPC mailing list in the coming two months: this would make the I-D an official working document of the research group. This would open the door for the next step: approval by the Internet Research Steering Group (IRSG) which bring the research group closer to developing substantive human rights protocol considerations to enable human rights on a protocol level.
In addition, several HRPC members also participated in the first ever civil society (friendly) dinner and joined to watch a screening of two documentaries: ‘Net of Rights’ and The Computers followed by a discussion with around 50 local civil society members, organized by ARTICLE 19 and the Asociación por los Derechos Civiles.